Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take a risk rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A majority of people in the modern days place great emphasis on life's achievement. Some people thus claim that a successful individual should consistently carry out new things and take risks rather than doing only familiar things. On the surface, both of them are not wrong; however, as far as I am concerned, I strongly disagree with such notion. I believe that the main keys to success in life are industriousness and elation. This essay will provide further aspects and examples to support this idea in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, success in people's lives comes from perseverance. It is undeniable that expertise plays a key role in having a flourishing life. Therefore, people have to continually practice their tasks if they desire to effectively develop their skills and knowledge. In addition, with their specializations, people are also capable of generating exquisite performances. Thus, higher productivity eventually allows people to get accolades and become successful. For instance, Cristiano Ronaldo, the most eminent football player, is known for his notable industriousness. He is not only talented but also works hard on his crafts. Furthermore, to achieve his goals, he practices rudimentary football skills repeatedly and also painstakingly improves his body. With all his endeavors, he finally is at the zenith of his field.
Secondly, another integral part of being successful is euphoria. Although playing a new role can sometimes keep jobs exciting, this novelty, ipso facto, also brings anxieties and complexities. Moreover, when individuals generate new jobs, they are forced to step out of their comfort zone. On the other hand, most people usually feel elated to achieve familiar tasks. With their comfortableness, Individuals tend to work effectively, and therefore, they carry out a plethora of flawless works. I can attest to this from my own experience; my architecture firm also assigns works to only employees who suit the job description. With this decent operation, all personnel thus are content to work, and they can result in an enormous number of tasks. This means that their elation is reflected in their works and leads to prosperity.
In conclusion, I firmly maintain the belief that generating things that people actually know how to do is more significant for being a successful person than taking risks. This is due to the fact that individuals who are flourishing have to painstaking to develop their skills, and their ecstasy leads to work productively.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend money on salaries university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A job with more vacation time but a low salary is better than a job with a high salary but less vacation time Use specific reasons to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take a risk rather than only doing what they know how to do well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34085213033 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05400991965 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591478696742 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8173840048 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7916666667 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18888540883 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487731948217 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682620830321 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130734218966 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702530893932 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.