When people work in teams, they are more productive than when they work individually.
Productivity. There is no such strong demand for anything in today’s fast-moving world as a demand for productivity. No wonder that an employee puts more weight on a worker with an ability to work in a team, than on a lone wolf. The employee is driven by the facts that, with a team, a work can be done quicker, better and with less stress for workers.
Although one can relate to the idea, that such a precious thing like time can be wasted on communication between team workers, he cannot deny, that once all informational bridges have been established, the time is no longer an issue. The more there are team members, the less significant the time loss is.
The time factor forms another crucial aspect of work – emotional factor. If the is only one person that is assigned some sort of work, he is able to plan his work in an efficient way matching his pace. But sometimes the responsibility of a failure can be unbearable. That’s why a team worker can be described as a more calm and, therefore, more productive – he is not worrying so much about the deadline like the individual worker.
Some may think that the productivity of an individualist worker is greater simply because he is the only one to begin and end the work, thus, he is more dedicated to it. But that is not completely true. Although he is able to put his soul in the work, he simple cannot be as qualified as a group of specialist. As a result, the quality of work is affected once again.
In conclusion, a team work is better for everyone – an employee and team workers themselves. The speed with which the work is done, its quality and, moreover, the condition of workers – all makes a team work a good tool for achieving great productivity.
- When people work in teams, they are more productive than when they work individually. 50
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 93
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 85
- If everyone would closely examine their past, they would realize that only a few individuals have played a role in shaping their behaviour and their way of thinking. 55
- Society is governed by two types of laws, just and unjust. People must obey just laws but are at liberty to defy those laws which they determine are frivolous or unjust. 30
Comments
Thank you for a detailed
Thank you for a detailed comment.
I think I've made a concession by the first sentence of the second paragraph. Actually, whole second paragraph can be treated as a concession.
I like you suggestions on imbalance of individual effort - something that I have not thought about while writing the essay.
As for the length, I am working on it (45 minutes is still not enough for me).
BTW, what is an appropriate (required) length of the essay?
Full essay evaluations
flaws:
No. of Words: 310 350
You may go this link for new GRE issue patterns:
http://testbig.com/question/gre-issue-essay-questions-new-gre-issue-ess…
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 310 350
No. of Characters: 1359 1500
No. of Different Words: 153 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.196 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.384 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.622 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 84 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 58 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 41 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.216 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.341 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.567 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.173 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Nice essay.
I'd like to point out that the length, though not of prime importance, is a factor in deciding your score. Your essay is a bit on the smaller size. An essay, that deserves a 6.0 in terms of language and ideas, may receive a 5.5 if it is small.
My observation is that you haven't utilized a concession point. It basically is a point opposite to your position. In an issue essay, you ideally state that the other side is right in one aspect, but it has more negatives. That's concession. Google it up.
If I were given this issue, my points would be:
-Imbalance of individual efforts in a team.
-Too many cooks spoil the broth
-Emperors, Kings, Presidents, Rulers all work alone. (Use this for examples)