The pie charts compare the proportion of students at one university in the UK who were able to speak languages other than English between 2000 and 2010
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of British students who can speak other languages besides English at a university in England in the years 2000 and 2010.
Overall, the amount of bilingual students with the ability to speak Spanish solely accounts for the largest proportion in both years, while the two smallest parts that remained stable over the period shown were German only and Two other languages.
In 2000, there was 20% of British students at this university can just speak English, while this figure for British students speaking only French made up 15%. With the same abatement, these numbers dropped to exactly 10% after 10 years. British students with the ability to speak only German and bilingual ones together kept the lowest percentage, at 10% in 2000. These two figures remained constant after 10 years.
On the other hand, British students at this university being able to speak only Spanish and use another language alternatively occupied 30% and 15% in 2000, correspondingly, then jointly jumped by 5% after a decade.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-03 | tlyphuong1 | 67 | view |
- The bar chart compares the amount of time spent by people in the UK on three different types of phone call between 1995 and 2002 78
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The pie charts compare the proportion of students at one university in the UK who were able to speak languages other than English between 2000 and 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie chart illustrates the percentage...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16374269006 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55752864535 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9096703591 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.142857143 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341756309581 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161547950144 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141676733819 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235603381227 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127937611902 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.