The given pie graph illustrates figure’s arrestee by gender in the US in 2010.
It is clear that we can see a correlation that the rate of female guilty more than male in group about violence against the person and theft. In contrast, the percentage of crime of male was higher than the proportion of that of female in other sin. Overall, figure’s people of violence against the person accounted for the highest in two gender.
The data for imprisoner of violence against the person of female was 35%, whilst that of male stood at 31%. The rate of jailee of theft of female was 32%, 12% more than the percentage of that of male.
In drug crimes type, the proportion of male was 10%, 4% more than the rate of that of female. Standing at 8%, the figure for homicide of female was 4% less than that of male. The proportion of burglary of male was 7%, compared to 3% of female. In robbery group, fraud and forgery group, the rate of male was higher than female 1%. Figure’s other crime of male which stood at 16%, was 2% more than that of female.
It is clear that we can see a correlation that the rate of female guilty more than male in group about violence against the person and theft. In contrast, the percentage of crime of male was higher than the proportion of that of female in other sin. Overall, figure’s people of violence against the person accounted for the highest in two gender.
The data for imprisoner of violence against the person of female was 35%, whilst that of male stood at 31%. The rate of jailee of theft of female was 32%, 12% more than the percentage of that of male.
In drug crimes type, the proportion of male was 10%, 4% more than the rate of that of female. Standing at 8%, the figure for homicide of female was 4% less than that of male. The proportion of burglary of male was 7%, compared to 3% of female. In robbery group, fraud and forgery group, the rate of male was higher than female 1%. Figure’s other crime of male which stood at 16%, was 2% more than that of female.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-08 | bichnguyen | 61 | view |
- The given line graph illustrates the figure of clients in some restaurants in Vietnam in 2019 67
- The given pie graph illustrates figure s arrestee by gender in the US in 2010 It is clear that we can see a correlation that the rate of female guilty more than male in group about violence against the person and theft In contrast the percentage of crime 61
- The given pie graph illustrates the rate of people of fitness center is Oslo Norway in 2010 and 2015 Overall the proportion of membership taking part in a fitness center had changed between 2010 and 2015 On the other hand the young people had growth up pe 61
- The given graphs illustrate the figure for market share and trade of top 6 PCs vendors around the world in 2018 We can see that market share was directly proportional with trade of brands technology On the other hand Lenovo has the highest percentages in 67
- The countries arranged international sports event with many benifical purpose However The nation had face to face social proplems from sport events 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gender' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'genders'.
Suggestion: genders
...person accounted for the highest in two gender. The data for imprisoner of violence a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.35359116022 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22008722296 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425414364641 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.9802528961 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.8 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43711371603 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212582874067 0.103423049105 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15389919122 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.358211994737 0.15604864568 230% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168362352395 0.0819641961636 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.65 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.