The reading passage claims that in the twentieth century, the archaeologists are faced with serious problems and limitations in Britain. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubts on the points made in the reading.
The reading passage claims that in the twentieth century, the archaeologists are faced with serious problems and limitations in Britain. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubts on the points made in the reading.
First, considering the article the growth of Britain's population, spurred a lot of construction projects and many valuable artifacts were lost during the construction process. In contrast, the professor in the lecture contradicts the idea and further explains that according to the new roles of construction in Britain, at the beginning of construction expertise must examine the location and if the zone was precious site they make plan for supporting the archaeological area.
Second, many archaeologists felt that financial support for research was inadequate. Admittedly, the professor in the lecture justified the information presented in the article and makes the point that construction companies financially support archaeologists and the government also makes more efficient plants for this scientific major more than past.
Third, the author puts forward the idea that it was difficult to have a career in archaeology. The speaker validates the idea and adds that today the government provided various job situations such as research positions, data analysis, construction supervisor, etc.
To sum up, both the writer and speaker hold conflicting views about this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-19 | Elhamsarvari | 78 | view |
- Some parent offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Problems with writer s explanations for mass extinction at the end of the Triassic period 60
- our kids less creative and lazier than before 66
- assembles a group of people into a team 65
- tpo13 assay 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70283018868 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12061368918 2.5805825403 121% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61320754717 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.8231613624 49.2860985944 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264455944295 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12502322508 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.194511823154 0.0662205650399 294% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182030759719 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.294889263213 0.0443174109184 665% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.3589403974 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.2367328918 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.