the number of birds in the United States will necessarily decline because of an increase in agriculture and pesticide use. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
The reading passage claims that the number of birds in the United States will necessarily decline because of an increase in agriculture and pesticide use. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
First, considering passage as human populations continue, with result that the number of birds will decline. In contrast, the professor in the lecture contradicts the idea and further explains that construction and expansion of cities provide new habitat for some birds and its not all the time with a decrease of birds population. Also, in some situations prepare prey in a new environment.
Second, the author in the article claims that agriculture activities will result in further destruction of bird habitats. Admittedly, the professor justifies the information presented in the passage and makes the point that actually areas as a converted to agriculture use are less than the past. Today people gain more crops of ground cause of efficient and fertile sites and consequently no more habitat distraction.
The writer puts forward the idea that human settlements expand and use pesticides increasingly. In the same way, the professor validates the idea and adds that new pesticides are under genetic modification and this kind of new chemical materials are not harmful for birds and just kill home garden pests. Moreover, the farmeries use fewer pesticides for protection of their farms.
To sum up, both the writer and speaker hold conflicting views about cuase of the bird's decline.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-19 | Elhamsarvari | 78 | view |
- Extended Family 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays 76
- debates about several possible explanations for mass extinction at the end of the Triassic period 60
- Why go to university 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, in contrast, kind of, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28455284553 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82339826531 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1470061142 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409900054574 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136364100599 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16736362839 0.0662205650399 253% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24065400292 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.285588705122 0.0443174109184 644% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.