The graphs below shows the average CO2 emissions per person in the UK, Sweden, Portugal ,and Italy from 1967 to 2007 .
The line chart illustrates the typical CO2 emissions individually in Britain, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal for over 40 years, starting in 1967.
Overall, amongst the four categories that rose significantly on CO2 emissions, Sweden went down , whereas in the United Kingdom remained steadily the highest emissions throughout the period.
The vast majority of emissions was in the United Kingdom with recorded data to around 11 metric tonnes and later on fell up to 8 metric tonnes suddenly. However, this marked the largest value emitted per person during the entire year. Similarly, Sweden began with just between 8-10 metric tonnes for 10 years. In 1977 onwards, figures declined slowly until nearly 6 metric tonnes the same with Portugal in the end year.
Italy and Portugal had the same trend of moving up figures from just above 4 and a metric ton relatively. Although the former category made the third rank of emissions it finished as the second, while Portugal and Sweden on the bottom.
- The chart below shows the average emissions of carbon dioxide per person in the United Kingdom Italy Sweden and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- The chart below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years . 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
- The chart shows the amount of waste production by households in the UK from 1990 with projections until 2030. 78
- The charts below show the average spending for British households from 1971 to 2001. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...antly on CO2 emissions, Sweden went down , whereas in the United Kingdom remained ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, similarly, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14110429448 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49362661722 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662576687117 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0754417852 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214856101347 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088480580861 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511340268629 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132857856857 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475045703603 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.