The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country in different days.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of people who visited a cinema on different days of the week in a European country in three separate years (2003, 2005 and 2007).
Overall, there weren’t many changes in people’s options over the period. As can be seen from the graph, people in this country mostly spent their weekends going to the cinema.
In terms of Monday, Tuesday and Thursday, the number of cinema visitors showed many fluctuations and its people were under 17% in 2005, 20% in 2003 and around 18% in 2007. Over that time, the lowest percentage of people went to this place on Wednesday, falling over 15% to under 10%. In contrast, the attendance on Friday reached a plateau at 30% in three years.
Looking at the figures for the weekend, 40% of people had visited the cinema on Saturday in 2003, 10% higher than Sunday’s. Both figures then climbed by roughly 15% in the following 2 years before dropping to approximately 10% in 2007.
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human s life Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but no local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 89
- The pie charts provided illustrate two major changes in the use of modes of transport to a certain university between 2004 and 2009 90
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79518072289 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5021111713 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626506024096 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6814117875 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297098581567 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106903969047 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101708870875 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173301854447 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999634146419 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.