If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable.
The argument claims that it is reasonable to do anything in order to achieve a worthy goal. In my view, although a goal with great value is worthy for people to devote themselves with great effort, this statement is too extreme. For any action, we need to consider the balance between the cost and the yield.
From a financial point of view, it is unjustifiable to invest in perspective things without limit. Considering that you are a manager of a company who needs to judge for investing a great amount of money on a promising but expensive project - if it succeeds, it will bring a huge lucre, if fail, it will risk a financial status of the company. For a sober manager, who has deliberated the consequence of failure will not interminably increase the budget over its tolerance. Once the project exceeds the company’s financial ability, the company would risk itself in bankruptcy and all the members will face unemployment not to mention achieving the original goal to achieve the project and make money.
From an ethical point of view, it is also unreasonable to achieve one’s goal at all costs. Take the previous president of America, Nixon as an example. He had done several sneaky things, such as eavesdropping on the phone of his opponents. Although it may, for Nixon himself, worth to do this unethical behavior is unacceptable and justifiable for people. Therefore, one needs to take other aspects and other people into account, it is by no means to attain a goal that only you think is valuable.
Another aspect is related to the environment. We all know stopping global warming is an important and urgent issue that is definitely worthy for we humans to tackle. Owing to that most greenhouse gas is emitted from the industry, the swiftest and most effective way to conquer the problem is to stop all the plants and factories. However, is it plausible to close all the industries that will produce noxious gas? In regard to these industries are the bone of the economy, it sustains the prospect of a country and feeds a lot of people; shutting it down we need to pay the unsustainable cost. Therefore, one needs to consider the priority of the action but not unscrupulously put it into practice.
To sum up, it is too extreme and unjustifiable to claim that to reach a worthy goal by any measure. It is necessary to judge it from other aspects such as finance, ethic, and the cost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 70 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Nowshin Tabassum | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | Hitesh2411 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- In an attempt to improve highway safety Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways But this effort has failed the number of accidents has not decreased and based on reports by the highway patrol man 73
- Sometimes imaginations is a more valuable asset than experience People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible and thus can approach a task without constraints of established habits and attitudes 79
- In any realm of life whether academic social business or political the only way to succeed is to take a practical rather than an idealistic point of view Pragmatic behavior guarantees survival whereas idealistic views tend to be supersede by simpler more 83
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
- Most people choose a career on the basis of such pragmatic considerations as the needs of the economy the relative ease of finding a job and the salary they can expect to make Hardly anyone is free to choose a career based on his or her natural talents or 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, such as, in my view, in regard to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75894988067 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77805622187 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520286396181 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3046717512 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.95 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145344379487 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392438885056 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556751153305 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889588899617 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586800381327 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.