CAM11 - TEST 4
The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the figures for guests who visit Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after its refurbishment. Simultaneously, the pie charts compare the outcome of surveys in which visitors were asked about their level of satisfaction after their visits during the similar two periods.
It can be clearly seen that the amount of visitors during the year after refurbishment is greater than that during the year before. Conversely, the figure for dissatisfied visitors during the period after refurbishment is far smaller than that during the year before.
After being refurbished, the museum had welcomed more visitors than before, the number of visitors had increased by 18000. Simultaneously, the number of very satisfied visitors had also risen dramatically to 35 after the museum was refurbished, while the figure for that during before the refurbishment was only 15. In contrast, the total number of visitors who felt dissatisfied fall from 40 to 15 after refurbishment. The figure for satisfied visitors during after refurbishment also decreased to only half of that during before the change while the number of no-response visitors remained unchanged at 5 despite the museum being refurbished.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- CAM11 TEST 4 The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two pe 67
- The chart below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Which is more important when choosing a job salary or job satisfaction 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42931937173 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01247827472 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486910994764 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4480168539 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.625 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455613393361 0.215688989381 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.229121335694 0.103423049105 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659374798775 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334331695586 0.15604864568 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561101167028 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.