The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents.
The diagrams illustrate a current road system and the future changes which are proposed in order to lower the accident figures.
Overall, the two main changes will be aimed at improving safety at the major road junctions, by introducing traffic lights and a roundabout.
At present, there are frequent accidents where Low Lane meets City Road, near the school. It is planned to install traffic lights to solve this problem. At the intersection of City Road and Forest Road, accidents also occur frequently in the vicinity of the supermarket. Therefore, the proposal is to build a roundabout, which will also provide a new replacement access road to the supermarket.
The removal of the road leading from City Road to the supermarket will prevent accidents involving traffic at the junction of City Road and this connecting road to and from the supermarket. By contrast, the proposed road system shows no changes to the hazardous junction of Low Lane and Forest Road, where accidents also often occur at present.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-12 | myduyen282 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-08 | phuc.phan160902 | 61 | view |
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Nowadays entertainers get paid more than politicians What are the reasons for this Is this a negative or positive development 82
- The diagram below shows the process of making olive oil
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11377245509 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77143965574 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502994011976 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2265010041 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294939938834 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148069870797 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107267253239 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209149784781 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103196699964 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.