The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not.
write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below
The provided chart illustratrates the grow rates of national goods in prosperous countries and countries which allow and do not allow universal method in business over 30 years from 1960s to 1990s.
At the first glance, it is clear that there was a gradual fall in well-off countries while globalisers showed a signficant increase. In contrast, though fluctuation, non-globalisers fall rapidly in the end of this period.
Although beginning approximately at 5% in 1960s, the percentages of domestic products of weathy countries decreased sharply at nearly at 3% in 1970s and this firgue ended exactly at 2% in 1990s. Countries adopting a global method showed a different pattern. It started from a low base around at 1,5%, this firgue then countinued raising around the vicinity of 3% in the next two decades, at 2.9% and 3.2% respectively. Globaisers product's data soared up to nearly 5% in 1990s.
On the other hand, the firgue of developing countries did not allow global approach was not stable. Accounting at 4.8% in 1960s, it reached its peak at more than 3% in the next decade and plunged to a low at just nearly 1% after that. The annual domestic product of those countries raised again in the end this period, accounting for exactly 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-14 | Ben.Afshar | 75 | view |
| 2021-03-06 | Nurimov Elyor | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-18 | Lien Huynh | 80 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Anh Thi | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-02 | myname95 | view |
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before 84
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
The provided chart illustratrates the grow rates of national goods in prosperous c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
... Although beginning approximately at 5% in 1960s, the percentages of domestic products o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1970s'.
Suggestion: in the 1970s
...tries decreased sharply at nearly at 3% in 1970s and this firgue ended exactly at 2% in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...70s and this firgue ended exactly at 2% in 1990s. Countries adopting a global method sho...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tinued raising around the vicinity of 3% in the next two decades, at 2.9% and 3.2...
^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...rs products data soared up to nearly 5% in 1990s. On the other hand, the firgue of deve...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roach was not stable. Accounting at 4.8% in 1960s, it reached its peak at more th...
^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1960s'.
Suggestion: in the 1960s
...ach was not stable. Accounting at 4.8% in 1960s, it reached its peak at more than 3% in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a low at just nearly 1% after that. The annual domestic product of those countri...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, well, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95714285714 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83987240619 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1215449662 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192941049491 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937815902661 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820743685605 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12337920771 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336995635212 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.