The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
The drawing depicts the centre of a small borough named Islip as it is now and plans for it is evolution. Overall, there are some major changes in the south side, at the same time there are many constructions are planned such as dual carriageway, bus station and new housing so on.
At present, shopping street is being located in the both side of the main road which is northernmost line of the borough. Housing is detected right ahead of the shopping street. In addition, park land is being located at east side which is at end of the road while school is being detected at southeast side of the town which is outside of the auxiliary path.
One of the massive update is dual carriageway which is placed around the main point. New housing will be organised at east side and south side of the village while size of school will be expanded and park land will be shrunk in the future. In the north side, instead of one of the old shopping streets there are new bus station, shopping centre, car park and sidewalk were planned.
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on cunstructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport 56
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry 11
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and the present 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 7.0 314% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48936170213 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32066122857 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3793426724 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0745706913062 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049226194148 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10985903477 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738022039523 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935140229426 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.