Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In these busy days of life, everyone is doing multiple things plausible in order to accomplish their needs. Nowadays working on various aspects by a single individual became a common thing, because of the modern technological inventions. However, there are some people who cannot concentrate on various things they do at a time, ultimately will end up by not excelling in their job. In my opinion, I feel that in this modern era, we can survive doing assorted things. I will be exploring my point of view hereunder.
Firstly, Some people are already multitalented and will ameliorate the work they are given with. Moreover, working on mixed things will save time and they can use that time for their personal preferences. Many people have similar leadership skills which enhance the work they are provided. Many individuals also argue that they cannot concentrate on various aspects of work at a time. Additionally, if they have to work on various things they should be given with a surplus amount of time because they can only concentrate one thing at a time. For instance, I am a dentist, I always love to work on innumerable aspects of my office practice, because I can handle the things perfectly and will end up doing well with my work. By this, we can say that individuals can work on different things if they have the quality of leadership goals and also possible upon concentrating.
Secondly, having busy schedules during a day is normal these days. To fulfill those needs many people are using technology to help themselves from saving time. Technology is helping at different heights for varied professions. Some people are of the idea that using technology will give them errors and have to spend extra time to enhance the work. My personal example is a compelling idea of this, When I was working at a dental clinic there is uncountable patients arrival at shorter time intervals. To overcome that, we imported some technologies which saved our time while helping in the treatment process. This clearly shows that with the help of technology people can reach their goal even by doing various things.
All in all, I vehemently assert that people can do their work well even if they work on numerous projects. The individuals with not only with leadership skills and concentration can do this by saving their time but also with the help of monumental technological inventions we can achieve.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-19 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-19 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | dedsecr | 60 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | dedsecr | 60 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | zmz | 76 | view |
- Possibilities of living on Mars 73
- Methods to prevent birds from getting injured 70
- several ways of detecting earthquakes 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site 70
- four day week working program 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are uncountable patients'?
Suggestion: there are uncountable patients
..., When I was working at a dental clinic there is uncountable patients arrival at shorter time intervals. To o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...at a dental clinic there is uncountable patients arrival at shorter time intervals. To o...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, i feel, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92628992629 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73464704597 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464373464373 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7719534421 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4761904762 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.380952381 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232699445543 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833564798996 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506147015937 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167545673277 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431924589991 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.