The best test of an idea is its ability to convince someone with opposing viewpoint. Only by being forced to depend an idea against doubt and contrasting views of others does one can really discover value of ideas
New ideas which are put forward will always be up for a debate. We can’t accept an idea to be universally true unless and until, it proves to be working under all circumstances. We can’t simply accept any idea in front of us, without questioning it. The idea’s ability should be judged on the basis of its capacity to prove the naysayers wrong.
Firstly, when person comes forward with some new ideas, he believes it to be true based on his understanding. Everyone has different prespective, the fresh mind looks at a particular idea in altogether different view. Thus, providing different understanding of the overall idea. Only when the idea is placed under such different views, can one fully conceptualize an idea, understand the background, full implications of the idea. This might even result in development of an otherwise undeveloped thesis into perfect ideas which can practically be implemented for the benefit of others.
Furthermore, the ideas aren’t tested as of yet, they are tested only when the ideas are open to doubts casted upon by others. They are truly tested only when the ideas can prove the doubters wrong. Take for instance, Ms Dhoni the former captain of the Indian cricket team, was scrutinized on his decision of dropping Sachin Tendulkar, the greatest batsman of all time, considered as even God in India, based on slow instincts in field which was costing the team extra runs. But, when India won the tri- series in Australia under tough conditions, the idea proved to be correct. The actual ability of the idea was understood. The idea proved the doubters wrong by working out well under tough circumstances. And Ms Dhoni, who was earlier scrutinized is hailed for his radical ideas.
Some might argue that, if the idea is not accepted by general public doesn’t really warranties that the idea is absurd. The opposition of Galileo’s idea of Earth revolving around the sun, was opposed by the catholic church based on strong beliefs, which weren’t backed up by logical reasoning. Such opposition wasn’t correct, as was proved later. So, the reasons for doubting the idea must be logical and not based on orthodox views. Orthodox views or some strongly held beliefs which are not proved true should not be used to oppose the idea. It should be valid situation or views based on logical facts.
Ideas must pass the litmus test for universal application. Otherwise, there can be situations where the ideas could create unforeseen circumstances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-17 | Sunny Chugh | 50 | view |
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter the college 58
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 50
- According to recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movie actually increas 53
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... implemented for the benefit of others. Furthermore, the ideas aren’t tested as ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: AS_OF_YET[1]
Message: Use simply 'yet' or 'as yet'.
Suggestion: yet; as yet
... Furthermore, the ideas aren’t tested as of yet, they are tested only when the ideas ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ue that, if the idea is not accepted by general public doesn’t really warranties that the idea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, really, so, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06038647343 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70845767141 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548309178744 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1027656779 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2916666667 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380305616287 0.243740707755 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127648536476 0.0831039109588 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735951631255 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235489944383 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392450933227 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.