Many people view that playing video games as harmless fun while others believe that video games have a positive effect on players. While I accept that video games affect positively on players in some cases, I partly believe that they are doing more harm to people in general and children in particular.
On the one hand, playing video games boost our creativity, imagination, problem-solving skills, and force us to think quickly. In this case, video games are both educational and entertaining. People can experience such a mysterious, magical world which does not exist in the virtual world, this helps them to unwind, release stress after a hard-working hour or an 8-hour studying at school.
On the other hand, video games set us in a sedentary lifestyle so we can glue our eyes to the screen for several hours. This leads to many problems related to health such as obesity, mental diseases, etc. Furthermore, communicating with others on the Internet for a long time can decrease our ability to have a face to face conversation in real life. Many youngsters are becoming addicted to video games so that they are even not attending school lessons or exam revisions.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential dangers of video games are more significant than the possible benefits
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views a 56
- Many young people today choose or are forced to go and work abroad What are the advantages disadvantages of living and working in a foreign country compared with living and working in your own country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even a useful educational tool Others however believe that video games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of workers from 5 different European countries that were absent for a day or more due to illness from 1991 to 2001 Summarise the information by selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming wider the rich is becoming richer and the poor are getting even poorer 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, in conclusion, in general, in particular, such as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 217.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97235023041 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7517039331 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617511520737 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4356967821 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433028358774 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174609018921 0.084324248473 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139942415733 0.0667982634062 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255878044862 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123520573933 0.056905535591 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.