Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no shortage of opinion on whether high-tech mobile phones' negative outcomes outweigh their benefits or not. I do not agree with the given statement. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the next paragraphs.
To begin with, there is no doubt that smartphones allow people to access new information and knowledge instantly. As long as there is a strong internet connection on the phone, it is extremely easy to reach and learn, new things from unlimited resources. For example, advanced navigation systems of smartphones allow people to find out the exact location of where they would like to go just in one second. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was backpacking in Europe, last summer, I could not find my hostel location in Amsterdam, even though I had a map of the city. After a couple of hours of searching, finally, I was lucky enough to find a free WiFi, therefore I used my smartphone's map application and abruptly I did not only understand which ways I had to take but also I learned the number of the specific bus that I had to take. Thanks to my phone's map application, I solved a huge problem. If I would not have owned a smartphone, I could not have downloaded a map application and therefore, I might have spent many more hours finding the destination of the hostel.
Secondly, I think within smartphones it is highly easy to connect with people. There are so many different applications and social networks where people can contact with their loved ones without putting extra effort. Applications like Whatsapp, Telegram, Skype are not only allowing people to receive written information from each other, but also provide them with interactive ways of communication such as video calls, sending videos, and voice messages. For instance, I have a Whatsapp group where all of my family members, included the extended family, are in that group. Even though many of them live in other cities, even other countries and continents it is extremely convenient to reach them via that particular Whatsapp group. My relatives sometimes send pictures of them, sometimes small video records, and voice messages. As a result, the technology provided by high-tech mobile phones makes this communication possible. Moreover, I even cannot imagine staying in touch like nowadays, in times where there were no smartphones.
To conclude, even though there are so many arguments that say smartphones do more harm than good I do not believe this. I think overall, the benefits of using smartphones outweigh its negative outcomes. This is because smartphones allow people to access much information instantly and they help people to stay in touch.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-16 | SaC | 70 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | Pyae Pyae Aung | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-13 | amchoi0810 | 90 | view |
- Some people say it is a waste of time when plan for future It is more important to focus on present To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- a Four day workweek 60
- Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed play them Do you agree or disagree with the statement 73
- Some people believe that to give opportunities to the new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire Do you agree or disagree 76
- Great Houses 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...sy to connect with people. There are so many different applications and social networks where ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2253.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96255506608 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82107689357 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537444933921 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.418374435 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.409090909 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14222314201 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458275834905 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667184848174 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967824269842 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049811771133 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.