four-day week working program
The reading and the lecture are about employees working a four-day week. The author of the reading feels that by working a
four-day week, employees can enjoy many benefits. However, the lecturer challenges all the claims made by the author
and explains hereunder.
First of all, the professor says that by accepting a four-day week program and hiring more employees, the companies will not get
the benefit because accepting more job-holders require huge space to work and also many electronic devices. Additionally, the
companies need to provide their employees with a lot of training and also they should offer medical benefits to the workers. This
way, additional costs will cut into company profits. On the other hand, the reading suggests that by implementing four-day
week program will give working to spend their free time enjoying and also relaxed. Moreover, hiring more employees will
not be an additional cost to the companies as the paychecks are the same to be issued.
Next, the writer mentions that it will reduce the unemployment rates for the people who are trying to get a job. Furthermore,
the workload will be decreased on four-day week full-time individuals as there are more workers to work the same work. On
the contrary, the academician argues that by over employment many jobs will be available for the people, but the companies will
ask people to work more as their expectations increase by having numerous people to accomplish their work. He also adds the
point that the jobs ill become unpleasant than present if they consider a four-day week schedule.
Finally, the tutor suggests that when people work for fewer hours they get a little salary, by which they cannot spend happily with
their family. Additionally, he mentions that these persons will lose their jobs first when the economy downturns. Even more,
the companies will be looking for the people who work for five days a week to offer promotions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | Hello GRE | 80 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | nusybah | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
- Methods to prevent birds from getting injured 70
- Television appearances by University Professors 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 80
- Instead of holding books or newspapers people nowadays normally hold electronic devices and watch bright screens to receive information and news Although it is much more comfortable than reading through paper materials there are many side effects of elect 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 25, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...companies will ask people to work more as their expectations increase by having n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1308411215 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59399627691 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504672897196 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8663101592 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 17.0 4.09492273731 415% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389760670441 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16319070341 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17061533386 0.0662205650399 258% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138267405902 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139021927749 0.0443174109184 314% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.