IELTS Task 1 - Food consumption in China, 1985 to 2010
The line graph shows information about the amount of meat, fish and salt consumed per person per week in China from 1985 to 2010. Overall, the food consumption in China increased over the period shown. In particular, the amount of meat and fish rose while the salt consumption experienced a steadily fall.
In 1985, the highest amount of food consumption was seen in fish, with around 600 grams/person/week. Meanwhile, the amount of salt and meat eaten per person per week were lower, just under 500 grams and about 100 grams respectively.
Five years after that, the amount of fish consumed experienced a small increase of 100 grams/person/week before dropping slightly back to 600 grams in 1995. However, for the next 15 years, there has been a steadily increase in the fish consumption to reach nearly 850 grams per person per week. Similarly, the amount of meat eaten by one person per week rose slowly to 200 grams in 2010. In contrast, the consumption of salt fell steadily over a period of 25 years to reach around 200 grams per person per week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-09 | trangianghuongli | 91 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
... while the salt consumption experienced a steadily fall. In 1985, the highest amount of food c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...salt and meat eaten per person per week were lower, just under 500 grams and about 1...
^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
..., for the next 15 years, there has been a steadily increase in the fish consumption to reach nearly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly, so, while, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 937.175257732 93% => OK
No of words: 182.0 206.0 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7967032967 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75338326973 2.54303337028 108% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 127.690721649 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483516483516 0.622605031667 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 290.88556701 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.7421268186 44.8134815571 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.0 76.5299724578 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 16.8248392259 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 4.34317383033 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142494373171 0.216113520407 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882869751171 0.0766984524023 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823038288088 0.0603063233224 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13120092521 0.12726935374 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836205590316 0.0580467560999 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 8.37731958763 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 70.7449484536 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 7.45979381443 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 8.71597938144 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.54 7.59969072165 86% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 41.2886597938 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.