The Pie Charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
The Pie Charts illustrate the information about how much is electricity power production by source in two different chess New Zealand and Germany in years of 1980 and 2010.
Overall, the most striking fact emerged from the pie chart, the highest units generated by coal in both years in new Zealand, while in Germany the maximum number of units from coal in 1980. year of 2010 the number of unit produced by nuclear elements.
To begin with, five elements generated power in New Zealand. Compare to the both charts of New Zealand, the minimum electric output by petroleum 4 units and 2 units in 1980 and 2020. Additionally,coal maximum produced electricity units in same years like 56 and 150 units. The second maximum electricity power produced Hydra Origins. Electricity units produced from natural gas, it was small different of units just 10.
According to the chart, 170 units and 2100 units generated by all 5 ingredients in Germany. Production of coal in Germany it was a similar units generated by coal in 1980 and 2010. We can see that, 20 units and 155 unites power were producing by nuclear in same years.
Electricity output from petroleum, it was a just 5 units different compared to 2010 like 22 units. Lastly It was minimal power production by hydro such as 7 units and 2 units.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-06-19 | mantue0909 | 56 | view |
2021-06-19 | mantue0909 | 56 | view |
2020-11-13 | Jango Jo | 78 | view |
2020-07-11 | faisal vhora | 89 | view |
2020-07-11 | MAHIR VHORA | 67 | view |
- Some people prefer to rise children in the cities while other believe that children should be rise in the countryside Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many people play sport when they are young but then stop when they become adults Why do so many adults stop doing physical exercise What can be done to solve this problem 78
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the years 2000 and predicted population growth up to until 2050 73
- The tabular give information about sales of firetrade lablled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 56
- cutting down tree is real environment threat yes this is still happening at a great rate around the world why do you think forests are being destroyed are there benefits from the destruction of forest 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Overall, the most striking fact emerged from the pie chart, the highest units ge...
^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Year
...imum number of units from coal in 1980. year of 2010 the number of unit produced by ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... both charts of New Zealand, the minimum electric output by petroleum 4 units an...
^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he minimum electric output by petroleum 4 units and 2 units in 1980 and 2020. Ad...
^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , coal
...d 2 units in 1980 and 2020. Additionally,coal maximum produced electricity units in s...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'unit'?
Suggestion: unit
...ion of coal in Germany it was a similar units generated by coal in 1980 and 2010. We ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, second, so, while, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82142857143 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6583612558 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477678571429 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0495058269 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0769230769 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2307692308 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29596038679 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127243599326 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116425040234 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207374548112 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12091261883 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.