The line graph gives information about the number of iranian, greek and turkish students who enroll at sheffielded university between 2005 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts international enrollees from Iran, Turkey and Greece at Sheffield University from the years 2005 to 2009.
Overall, there were two trends in enrolment over the period under review. While the number of Greek students dropped over the years, those from Iran and Turkey increased.
Greek enrollees were actually the most at the beginning of the period at approximately 180. It then declined dramatically to less than half of this value in 2007. Subsequently, it largely plateaued on this latter number until 2008 and then fell steadily to end the period at just about 40 students.
Twenty Turkish students were enrolled in 2005, with Iranian students double those from Turkey. Their numbers both accelerated over the next one year with the number of Turkish students outpacing that of Iran at 2006-2007 interval. Despite this, they still both rose gradually to both enrol almost 120 students each between 2008 and 2009. They then ended the period under review with 160 students and approximately 120 students from Iran and Turkey respectively
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-12 | Aksa Sarah | 89 | view |
- Some think that children should start school as early as possible while others believe that they should start school at the age of seven Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people say that main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are important environmental problems Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and in 67
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 78
- The table shows the percentage of people with mobile phones who use various features on their phone Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The percentage of people using various mobile phone features 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23255813953 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53973293375 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593023255814 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9477667759 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.0 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216496715031 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890678625733 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545888465557 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131256241504 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463860915457 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.