Some systems require students to speacialize in a limited range of subjects from the age of fifteen. Other systems require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school? What are the benefits of two education systems and what is better ?
A brand new education system for students above the age of 15 years old, that provides pupils with customized specialized topics, is rising and becoming widely popular. Thereafter, commentators interestingly dispute about whether to enroll their children in a specialized or a traditional system directed schools. This essay will explore arguments to both sides of the debate and provide details to aid readers in deciding which option provides the greater benefit.
A few observations offer support to consider specialized schools as an advantageous option. To start with, these schools prepare students for their next step, college, which teaches them a limited range of topics. Many university students experience an educational shock during their first year at college, with most withdrawals and failures occurring during the first academic year. Not only this point is salient, but we have to consider we currently live in the era of subspecialty. For instance, historically, a doctor used to handle different diseases affecting the body including ear infections and pregnancy-related disorders simultaneously, whereas the story is completely different nowadays.
Despite the points mentioned above, an endorsement for a traditional teaching system subsists. One supportive argument states it exposes students to a variety of subjects helping them to which field they will pursue their career in. Moreover, students have different interests, and some struggle in certain special topics that do not attract them.
For the aforementioned points, a specialized customizable education system is clearly the answer to parents hesitating about which system surpasses the other.
All in all, controversy and debate will continuously surround this issue, but the best recommendation for those caught in within these arguments would include the consideration of the above points. Bearing in mind we are living in the era of subspecialty, the best choice would be what prepares students for their next level.
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life What are those problems Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns 67
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and
- The table shows the percentage of journeys made by different forms of transport in four countries The bar graph shows the results of a survey into car use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 89
- The diagram below shows how rain water is collected and then treated to be used as drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, whereas, for instance, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68874172185 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08755614337 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632450331126 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8725066687 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19791976421 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644393079859 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527850237596 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111895165313 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043360908977 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.