The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The greatness of individuals can be decided equally by their contemporaries as well as the future generations.In some cases it may even be hard for future generations the gauge the level of greatness, because the have not lived in the same times as the individual and his contemporaries.To get the appreciation and praise of your contemporaries is considered to be the highest form of approbation that an individual can get. In other cases detailed analysis done by future generations can lead to greater veneration.These examples will strengthen my case.
Let us take the example of Mohandas Karam...
- some people claim that you can tell whether a nation is great by looking at the achievements of the rulers, artists or scientists. Others argue that the surest indicator of a great nation is, in fact, the general welfare of its people. 66
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today 95
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Alta Manufacturing."During the past year, Alta Manufacturing had thirty percent more on-the-job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Exper 73
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 60
- In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature. 79
Leave a blank space after punctuation marks. E-rater is sensitive.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 436 350
No. of Characters: 2093 1500
No. of Different Words: 238 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.57 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.8 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.852 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 135 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 107 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 55 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.762 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.341 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.296 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.481 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.116 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5