Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Entertainment is an important aspect of life and it can come in many different forms. Some believe that live shows such as music events, sports, and plays are much more exciting when viewed live rather than on TV. This essay will discuss the differences between live and televised productions.
Firstly, live shows are very exciting to experience. This is because the organizers spend vast amounts of time and money making sure that viewers have a thrilling experience. The whole point of producing a live show is to put on a good show for the viewers. Secondly, live shows allow the attendees to be more immersed in the event than simply watching it on the television. Oftentimes, large events such as concerts involve amazing light shows, dazzling pyrotechnics, memorabilia such as t-shirts, and delicious food and drinks. The next paragraph will discuss some of the drawbacks of seeing performances in person.
Although live shows are great, they do have some disadvantages which television does not. To begin, physically going to an event can be costly. Oftentimes people have to travel long distances and take time off of work or school in order to witness one of their favourite celebrities acting or singing. Also, entrance tickets to these types of events can be quite expensive. On the other hand, television allows audiences to view their favourite acts from the comfort of their own homes for a relatively low price. Furthermore, new technology enables viewers to record the event and watch it at a time that is most convenient for them. Lastly, some individuals enjoy hosting TV viewing parties in their homes. They can cook food for their friends and are not limited by time and money.
In conclusion, the opinion of the writer is that live events and televised events are both enjoyable. Seeing a live performance puts the viewers right in the middle of the action and allows them to experience the show with all five senses. Television, on the other hand, is cheaper and often more convenient. Perhaps in the future, development in virtual reality will allow people to watch from home, while feeling as if they are really there.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-10 | dinhngocquynh2003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | Pham Van Nhan | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
- The chart shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 67
- The bar chart shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think the news has no connection to people s lives so then it is a waste of time to read the news in the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Attending a live performance for example a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rtant aspect of life and it can come in many different forms. Some believe that live shows suc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...drinks. The next paragraph will discuss some of the drawbacks of seeing performances in per...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, really, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98611111111 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66249529067 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572222222222 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.646072788 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4761904762 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248320264729 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703174877909 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603022077821 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149370212058 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180649937887 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.