People think that countries should produce foods their population eats and import less food as much as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the priority to enhance residents’ quality of life, it is questioned for each country whether the import of food should be limited to promote national food production. While self-supply of food can be beneficial to some extent, I believe that food imports should be encouraged under certain circumstances.
On the one hand, it is advantageous to invest in national food production. Once a country can self-supply food for its population sufficiently, that country can be independent of food sources. The independence of food sources could be one of the essential factors for national sustainable development. Additionally, regional food manufacturing, if invested properly, could not only improve products’ quality but also provide more job opportunities for the local denizens. Moreover, the reduction of imported food could alleviate environmental problems caused by food transportation.
However, I take the view that not all countries should put a limit on importing overseas food. For China, where the population is usually over the domestic provision of food, importing food is crucial. If the policy of limiting imported food was applied, the demand of all the denizens could hardly be satisfied due to the insufficiency of food. One benefit of importing food is that the consumers can have a variety of food choices and properly can experience different cuisines within a country. Besides, food import plays a vital role when it comes to the economy, contributing a considerable income for countries and relating jobs as well.
In conclusion, the self-production of food may be necessary for the sustainable development of a country, but food imports could play an important role in enhancing denizen’s well being and national economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-09 | nguyenkhangtriem | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-09 | nguyenkhangtriem | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | Chinkiarora | 71 | view |
- The table shows the changes in modes of travel in a European country between 1995 and 2005 It also shows a projection to the year 2015 58
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for the period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 86
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton 78
- Topic Some people claim that tourism can help to bridge cultural gaps between people of different nationalities and cultures Do you agree or disagree 94
- The Graph shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46886446886 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25159617292 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56043956044 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7537600952 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.846153846 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298186173717 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145891561862 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505182017571 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216156586589 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541280948866 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.