Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Public transportation has always been an important backbone, supporting the development of cities. However, we are now entering a society which relies heavily on the Internet. Based on the perspective, I think that it is more necessary for governments to support Internet access rather than public transportation.
First, as far as I'm concerned, improving Internet access is actually more cost-effective than the other. While sometimes they serve the same purpose, renovating public transportation requires more amount of money since it includes building or purchasing extensive hardware and labor. For instance, if the government wants to construct a new subway route, they may need to spend money on setting up construction sites, employing workers or buying new trains. On the other hand, cost for improving Internet access, which only requires equipment with smaller sizes and a small pool of intelligent workers, is less expensive.
Furthermore, Internet can serve as important tools which public transportation cannot substitute for. In contrast, public transportation can be easily replaced by Internet services from many aspects. For example, the revolution of the Internet has fascinated the trend of adapting to a more flexible working style. That is, many people shift to working from home, by which they do not have to spend any time on commuting to different places. This has certainly decreased the demand of public transportation.
Last but not least, reliance on Internet services has been surging up nowadays. Lots of companies requires the Internet to help them store and manage data, provide a smooth information flow within employees and managers, as well as offering customized services to their clients. What’s more, as firms have grown larger and more internationalized nowadays, branches located in different countries mainly uses the Internet to communicate. If the government funds more in Internet services, those companies can apply a faster method of transferring data, thus improving the chance of making more profit and raising the nation’s GDP. On the other hand, I am not sure about how public transportation can do the same.
To wrap up, I believe that investing in internet services can be more cost-efficient, for the reason that its serves the community with benefits that can hardly be replaced with, and can enhance a nation’s competitive niche. As a result, spending money on improving Internet access is much more essential than working on public transportation.
- Problems of sending human to Mars 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 88
- Topic Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 89
- TOFEL TPO52 90
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...lic transportation. First, as far as Im concerned, improving Internet access is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in contrast, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47179487179 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09231619678 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0216136143 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.315789474 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5263157895 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78947368421 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405154018364 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124740085139 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843592358623 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233231316435 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416896103559 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...lic transportation. First, as far as Im concerned, improving Internet access is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in contrast, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47179487179 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09231619678 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0216136143 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.315789474 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5263157895 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78947368421 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405154018364 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124740085139 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843592358623 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233231316435 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416896103559 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.