Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In the theory, it is a government’s duty to solve the problems of the both present and the future. Unfortunately, a government’s resources are limited, and a compromise between today and tomorrow is always a necessity. However, allocating the most of resources to the future is more beneficial to the society for two main reasons.
Most of the solutions of the present can’t be solved but only can be halted. Most problems confronted by modern societies don’t stem from recent factors but have convoluted roots in the past, and these roots make the solving problems of today very arduous. Therefore, it is much wiser to spend the resources in a way to halt problems and try to solve them on a long term instead of spending extreme sources on short term solutions. As an analogy, a town’s water pipe system can be given. If the town’s pipes cause problems, it would be more logical to change the pipes part by part, and provide the water to the parts of the town with water pipe abeyance caused by repair process, instead of trying change all of the pipes at the same time.
Moreover, solving the possible problems of the future at today is more efficient. As stated, the problems of the society tend to have roots at the distant past and the problems thrive on these roots as the time goes on. As the problems get bigger and more troublesome, abating them becomes more expensive and time consuming, and hence earlier you deal with them, more effortless it becomes, and the optimal time for dealing a problem is before it is extant. Henceforth, allocating resources on the problems of the future is a much more beneficial strategy at the long term.
Undeniably, present problems are much more impactful on the people, and basing on this, some one can state that the problems of the today must be solved first. Nonetheless, the solving problems of the future is more beneficial as explained, and temporary solutions can be realized to lessen the impacts of the problems on people. Also, starting to solve the future’s problems is a transition process. As a nation focuses on the creating a better future, the problems that will be faced in the future will lessen and there wouldn’t be any significant problem that should be solved on the present.
To sum it up, if the future’s problems are solved before they thrive and turn to behemoths, it will be much more beneficial for the society than trying to divest a problem of the today without expiration of its roots that are extending to the past. The best way to solve the problems of the today is to start from the problems of tomorrow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | guozhishan | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | sami18 | 79 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | shekhar | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 50 | view |
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away thus 60
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful bacter 73
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 60
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada s arctic regions They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough at le 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the resources') or simply say ''most resources''.
Suggestion: most of the resources; most resources
...ys a necessity. However, allocating the most of resources to the future is more beneficial to the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 707, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...epair process, instead of trying change all of the pipes at the same time. Moreover, s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...tful on the people, and basing on this, some one can state that the problems of the toda...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m that should be solved on the present. To sum it up, if the future’s problems a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75384615385 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64486113508 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426373626374 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 670.5 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6632070646 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.166666667 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2777777778 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285799980923 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117931597384 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679174488077 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185528623488 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547155075753 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.