Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports. Others, however, believe that people should have the freedom of choosing sporting activities they like. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
With the progression of society, participating in extreme sports has become a common phenomenon. Some people argue that the government should prevent citizens to attend dangerous sports while the others believe the government should not take away the freedom of playing sports. This essay will look into both sides and discuss why
To begin with, there are several reasons why the government should enact laws to prevent dangerous sports. Since most dangerous sports can lead to severe injuries, citizens are exposed to the risk of getting harm. Furthermore, the burden of the healthcare system will increase as more injured people need medical treatments. When more tax revenue goes into medical facilities, other essential public services, such as education and infrastructures may be underfunded and it can lower citizens’ standard of living. Also, dangerous sports can have adverse impacts on the next generation. Due to the immature mentality of youngsters, they may fail to recognize the severe consequences of dangerous sports and view it as a way to pursue excitement. They are likely to engage in dangerous sports without proper guidance, which will lead to severe damages to their body as well as development.
On the other hand, some people disagree with the opinion of forbidding dangerous sports. Since the government is elected by citizens, it is their responsibility for protecting individuals’ freedom, including the freedom of doing dangerous sports. In this sense, banning dangerous sports will be against the obligations of the government and violate some people’s rights. The support rate of the government will reduce when the policies that against dangerous sports are formulated. In addition, banning dangerous sports may lead to undesirable effects on the economy. For example, some cities are famous for outdoor activities, such as skiing and surfing and this will attract numerous sport lovers. Once these sports are banned, fewer tourists will pay a visit to these cities and the local business will suffer from that.
In conclusion, the government has legitimate concerns on dangerous sports because of its negative effects on public funding and the younger generation. However, banning dangerous sports completely can be detrimental to human rights as well as the economic growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-15 | ChanChan97 | 67 | view |
- An increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during their life Is this a positive or negative development 84
- There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones What forms do they take Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phone 84
- The bar chart compares the changes in the places where people used to surf the Internet in the years 1998 2000 2002 and 2004 78
- Currently many people fail to balance the work with the other parts of lives what are the reasons and how to solve it 84
- Some scientists believe that intelligent life forms may exist on other planet and some want to send messages to send them Others think that these life forms may be too dangerous Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill look into both sides and discuss why To begin with, there are several reasons...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, look, may, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46388888889 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83037836104 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9508144488 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.277777778 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387174253704 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124753584405 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827305149342 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243910979985 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732767871389 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.