The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 ad 2010 about one university
The table compares the data about the results of observations in certain years (2000, 2005,2010) about the university. The information can be divided into two groups: resources and education quality, with the former having larger indexes.
According to the table, it can be noticed that electronic sources witnessed a considerable increase. Therefore, it increased from 45% in 2000 to 72% in 2005 and hit a peak in 2010 being 80 %. Though there were slight fluctuations in the points of print resources, it became 88% in 2010. Teaching facilities over a 10-year period remained steadily at the same point which was consisted of 77%.
Although teaching quality was just under two thirds, it decreased even more than the first point in 2005 which was followed by a rise and reached a peak at 69% in 2010. Comparing three indexes of range of modules offered, it was getting down gradually from well under a third in 2000 to 30% in 2005 and became 27% in 2010.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
- Recent figures show an increase in violent crime among youngsters under the age of 18. Some psychologists claim that the basic reason for this is that children these days are not getting the social and emotional learning they need from parents and teacher 85
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 73
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 ad 2010 about one university 90
- The diagram below show how leather goods are produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 88
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 164 200
No. of Characters: 764 1000
No. of Different Words: 103 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.579 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.659 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.612 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 52 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.937 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.375 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.407 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.617 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.063 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4