"Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with the station's coverage of weather and local news. In addition, several local businesses that used to run advertisements during our late-night news program have just cancelled their advertising contracts with us. Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to our news programs and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should expand the coverage of weather and local news on all our news programs.
The author of the given memorandum talks about the consequences of devoting less time to weather and local news in their late-night program news program leading to losses. The author states a few reasons for these mishappenings in this memorandum. In my view, the author's reasons are unsubstantiated and seem unpersuasive due to the following reasons.
Firstly, the author claims that the news agency over the past years has given more time to national news than the weather and local news which has led to complaints from the viewers regarding the coverage of weather and local news. In my opinion, giving more time to national news might not be the only reason for these complaints. It might be possible that various other factors have led to these complaints. Maybe the people did not take interest and disliked the agency's coverage of national news. It may also be possible that the news agency had put falsified claims in their coverage of national news which the people might have found out at a later stage and have led to these complaints. It is also possible that as it was a late-night show, people would have been more interested to get the weather updates for their next day at work than listen to what's going on in the nation. So there are many reasons, that might have led to these complaints which the author does not account for.
Furthermore, the author talks about the local businesses canceling their advertisement deals with the news agency. There may have been far more reasons for them to cancel their advertisement deals than just the telecasting of national news. It may have been possible that, as the advertisements were telecasted in the late-night shows the TRP was not that great. Owing to that, they may have decided to advertise their shows in the morning news program as more people prefer to watch the news in the morning. So, the author blaming the telecasting of national news leading to losing advertisement revenues is pretty absurd and lacks evidence. Had the author put in some evidence claiming telecasting of national news leading to these consequences it would have given more support to the author's claims.
Finally, the author thinks that if the author devoted more time to weather and local news, it would restore to its former level. In my view, these are author's presumptuous assumptions and lack mettle. Had the author devised a perfect plan to bring the coverage up, it would have given the claims more support.
In conclusion, I would like to say that the author's claims are flawed and based on unclear reasons. Had, the author kept the above suggestions in mind, it would have bolstered the claims. So the author need to attach pieces of evidence to make the argument well-reasoned.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-31 | tomlee0205 | 78 | view |
2023-08-27 | yirtusemla | 50 | view |
2023-08-19 | riyarmy | 58 | view |
2023-07-30 | aryaman | 58 | view |
2023-07-27 | searchinglife06 | 66 | view |
- It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed 73
- While the Department of Education in the state of Attra suggests that high school students be assigned homework every day the data from a recent statewide survey of high school math and science teachers give us reason to question the usefulness of daily h 50
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim a 58
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 58
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice for a client Most homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating Last heating season that regi 49
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 858, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...r their next day at work than listen to whats going on in the nation. So there are ma...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce to make the argument well-reasoned.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, well, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 28.8173652695 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 55.5748502994 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2279.0 2260.96107784 101% => OK
No of words: 467.0 441.139720559 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8800856531 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58512436904 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 204.123752495 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413276231263 0.468620217663 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 705.55239521 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.93925162 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.590909091 119.503703932 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2272727273 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.70786347227 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278744667288 0.218282227539 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959745325271 0.0743258471296 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114936017106 0.0701772020484 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156930524128 0.128457276422 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910783744698 0.0628817314937 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.3799401198 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.32208582834 88% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 98.500998004 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 858, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...r their next day at work than listen to whats going on in the nation. So there are ma...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce to make the argument well-reasoned.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, well, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 28.8173652695 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 55.5748502994 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2279.0 2260.96107784 101% => OK
No of words: 467.0 441.139720559 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8800856531 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58512436904 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 204.123752495 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413276231263 0.468620217663 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 705.55239521 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.93925162 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.590909091 119.503703932 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2272727273 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.70786347227 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278744667288 0.218282227539 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959745325271 0.0743258471296 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114936017106 0.0701772020484 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156930524128 0.128457276422 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910783744698 0.0628817314937 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.3799401198 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.32208582834 88% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 98.500998004 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.