Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
To be an effective political leader, one must be constantly committed to principles and not to be vacillated on its principle. Adherence to the own principles values which shows puissant leadership quality and clairvoyance of the leader. Our history reflects many such leaders who had the pertinacity of their morals and eventually lead to successful governance. Critics may say that the political leaders who reconcile with the public for their better future and abandon principle for the sake of compromise but, eventually they will see to be a failure of leadership. Hence I agree with the second part of the statement that political leaders must stick to their principles to become successful.
Firstly, leadership quality encompasses industriousness, artful, and determination of auspicating the things on the base of self-confidence and not swaying with other opinions. For example, Abraham Lincon fought for slavery in Africa and attenuated jaundice in white and black without listening to others and sticking to their own rules. Lincon also convinces the north that slavery was evil, detrimental and people are still ambivalent about the effects of slavery. He was also convinced that ending slavery was worth monetary for the loss of cost and human life. If Lincon had not determined his rules and principle and had yielded to the public opinion and taken a more conciliatory attitude, he would not have created such a positive change in the history of the nation.
Secondly, this quality of leadership not only conducive to the leader but also helps to inspire and incentivize others to make a humongous change in society. For example, Mahatma Gandhi always uses nonviolent policy and supporting the truth which was acts like the catalyst for the independence of India. If he had resorted to the violence and conciliate with the public then a dramatic change of freedom might not happen.
Moreover, when anyone sways with the public opinion it becomes the social blunder to identify the solution or conclusion. However, a political leader can listen to the public problems which are essential to the leader but must find out extrapolation by himself based on their principles. This way the communication will remain clear and blunder won't happen.
In totality, the leader always has some quality and principle to follow based on the context or the experience. This will conducive to maintain the social framework, and political structure without blunder and becoming a more effective political leader.
- Some people think that parents or other older relatives should make important decisions of their older teenage children Others think that they should do it by themselves What do you think 76
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition 72
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 83
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves 50
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 571, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...will see to be a failure of leadership. Hence I agree with the second part of the sta...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2114.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25870646766 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87339599506 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52736318408 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.960294939 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.444444444 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350663060328 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101341717897 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731081603195 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183401979448 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815912555976 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.