Which one do you prefer?
A company offering you a job with challenging and interesting project but fewer vacation days or another company offering you a job that is not so challenging and interesting but more vacation days.
In today's modern and sophisticated world, choosing an appropriate job plays a vital role in people's lives. In this connection, each person has different priorities to select a career. Although contested by many that the matter of applying for a vacancy with fewer vacation days and fascinating tasks is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that having vacation days should be preferred by who wants to choose a career, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, more vacation days in a job provides an ideal opportunity for people to strengthen their family bonding; thus, it is an essential factor for applying in a vacancy. To be more specific, when one works approximately nine hours a day, they cannot dedicate enough time to participate in family activities on regular days. According to my own experience, two years ago, I worked in a profitable company, so I should perform the challenging duties needing innovative ideas. I felt satisfied with my career; however, I could not allocate time to my family, leading to a reduction in family interactions. As I did not spend time with them, we did not have mutual conversations or interests. Moreover, they compelling about my hard job situation. Therefore, I decided to ask my manager for more vacations, but he rejected my requirement. Accordingly, I quit my career to establish and improve my family relationship again.
Second, while engaging in an interesting task is great, few vacation days decrease people's health. To elucidate, people need to maintain their health by resting because it decreases their mental stress, which causes a host of disease. For example, my father liked his career, and he worked for a tremendous amount of time, but after a while, he felt exhausted since he should deal with many challenges in his career. Unfortunately, his career was prolonged, which did not allow him to have vacations. Because he had a considerable amount of stress, he had a heart attack, thereby leaving his job. When he left his job, he has escaped from mental pressure, which was experienced during work.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that people should choose a job with a flexible time rather than an enjoyable one. Not only does having unlimited working hours hurt family communication, but it also increases the risks of health problems.
- Do you prefer watching TV programs for knowledge or just for entertainment 76
- Are government doing well in educating people to pay attention to the importance of the food nutrition and healthy eating 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for the government to spend money on art museums and concert halls than on recreational facilities such as swimming pools and playgrounds 76
- As a student of university that has a long break between university semesters the university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break Take a course on the subject that has no direct connection to their majors of stud 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercise 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...increases the risks of health problems.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2086.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08780487805 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95784380524 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590243902439 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7641405719 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164579857489 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492874419256 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396013117129 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984426224069 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286965082582 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.