Children are always the special members of a family, since many parents love and cure about their children and help them avoid encountering any difficulties in their life. Thus, an interesting debate arises whether children should play and study instead of learning how to do household chores. As far as I am concerned, there is no doubt that parents should let their children learn and participate in household chores. My reasons and examples are given bellow.
Firstly, teaching children how to do household chores is a good way for parents to interact with their children. Nowadays, many parents are busy at work, as a consequence, they spent little time with their parents. But childhood is a very precious period and children need someone accompany them and solve their questions about the world. By teaching their children how to do household chores and doing chores together, parents can enhance the interaction with their children and know what they are thinking about, which is also benefit for children’s growth.
Secondly, doing household chores can help cultivate the responsibility of children, which is an essential character of a person in the modern society. By doing household chores, children will know he or she should be responsible for what he or she say and do. For example, if we ask children to clean their own tableware, then they might finish up their plate and not waste the food. As we can see in many requirements such as apply for universities and companies, responsibility is usually on the top of the list. Equipping with responsibility, children will be more comparative in the job market in the future.
Admittedly, I am not denying the value of playing and studying for children. Since playing with friends is children’s instinct and studying is a very important part of the childhood. However, if children do not know how to do household chores, it would be hard for them to live independently in the future.
To put in a nutshell, the importance of learning and doing household chores cannot be overestimated. There is an old saying in China: “a person who never clean up his house is unlikely to clean up the whole world”, which means a great success starts with single tiny tasks. Maybe household chores are the first step towards success.
- TPO21 integrated 80
- Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Do you agree or disagree 76
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 70
- TOEFL T P O 3 Integrated Writing Task 52
- Claim Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive Reason It is primarily in cities that a nation 039 s cultural traditions are preserved and generated Write a response in which you discuss 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'accompanies'.
Suggestion: accompanies
...ecious period and children need someone accompany them and solve their questions about th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'benefited', 'benefitted'.
Suggestion: benefited; benefitted
... they are thinking about, which is also benefit for children’s growth. Secondly, doi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... market in the future. Admittedly, I am not denying the value of playing and studying for c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00783289817 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82122343174 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516971279373 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3070624057 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.947368421 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1578947368 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370379369861 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12285682751 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574508020239 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215993477495 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430270718197 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.