Some people say that parents should encourage their children to take part in organized group activities in their free time. Others say that it is important for children to learn how to occupy themselves on their own. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
It is certainly true that few individuals think that parents should motivate their kids to participate in group work activities, whenever they have some time, whereas few others believe that these lads should be left to learn on their own. I do not concur with the former view and will explain my stand with examples.
Those who advocate children participating in teamwork whenever they are free may argue that by doing so they will learn a lot of soft-skills like co-operation, adaptability and leading from the front, which is not usually taught in schools. For example, if a bunch of students are trying to build a boat together by reading about it and watching youtube videos, they will acquire the knowledge of sailing, wind direction and most importantly on how to divide tasks between them, teaching co-operation. If in case, these youngsters were working alone, it would have been quite difficult for them to make progress. Moreover, giving them a chance to work together at an early age will also help in building bonds for the rest of their lives. As a result, it is prominently important that students do group activity in their free time.
On the other hand, in my view, young lads spending their pastime on their own is more beneficial for their overall growth. This will give them an opportunity to explore things and not follow a set path. For instance, a child can try to make different things by using building-blocks at his own speed, utilizing the images of something he has seen on television. The child might not be able to make something useful at a young age but will definitely gain an understanding of how things work. Additionally, as an adult we are often asked to think out of the box, this thinking will never develop if we just follow what everyone else is doing. Hence, kids doing something on their own is the way forward for their growth.
In conclusion, despite the fact that there are compelling arguments in favor of youngsters doing teamwork like learning soft skills and building bonds for life, we must take into consideration that self-exploration is more vital for overall growth. Personally, I feel that giving a chance to gain knowledge by self-learning is more just, and justice in my view is paramount.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-22 | ernchawla | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | Falaka14 | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-08 | hivafara77 | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-08 | hivafara77 | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-16 | sharmaisha | 61 | view |
- Some people work for the same organizations all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work education or shopping To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Children today are too dependent on computers and electronic entertainment It would be better to encourage them to spend more time outside playing sports and games Do you agree or disagree 95
- Some people think it is good to raise children in a city Others argue that it is better for children to grow up in the countryside Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- wealth does not necessarily guarantee happiness to what extent do you agree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84715025907 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76260203174 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564766839378 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.7188268009 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.733333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7333333333 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267299538662 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942448532116 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925903657704 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157568686998 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475106482172 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.