Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both view and give our opinion
Environmental pollution and its solution are a problem that is concerned by the public. There are many factors affecting the environment such as natural disasters, .. human activity is one of the factors that have the greatest impact. Some believe that the impact of these activities can be improved, while others find it really difficult to change. Both points of view above, I believe, have convincing justifications with the preference to the latter over the former.
From a perspective, there are some people who think is very difficult to find ways that can be altered influence from human activities on the environment. That means the change depends on the perceptions of each person because people are the most important factor and have the ability to decide everything. For example, governments around the world have issued regulations banning indiscriminate littering and must everyone to comply. In fact, the percentage of people who complied is less than the percentage who broke the law that is impossible to improve the environment. In addition, it also depended on the current state of government organization, the economy, education, etc… of each country. You can see when a country has a developed economy, companies can use a modern machine to waste treatment are not suitable for an undeveloped country.
On the other hand, some people believe that we can together create activities alternative and reduced influence on the environment. Because when we do it together, that helps to change the minds of many others, making them conscious in protecting the environment it's almost like the meaning of the proverb "Together we can change the world". Each person can start protecting the environment from simple activities in daily life. For example, you can save on food, water; recycling paper, cartons, plastic bottles; using public vehicles instead of using private vehicles. These activities seem very simple but they are highly effective and pervasive, especially suitable for everyone to easily do. Furthermore, it meets the needs of undeveloped countries for environmental protection. Is the foundation for modern projects with higher costs.
In conclusion, to change something we need effort and perseverance for a long time. I believe that human beings can reduce the environmental impact of human activities, we can start everything the simplest things like disposing of trash in the right place.
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world Some people think that this cannot be changed while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change Discuss both views and give our opinion 73
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world Some people think that this cannot be changed while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change Discuss both view and give our opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... environment such as natural disasters, .. human activity is one of the factors th...
^^
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Human
...vironment such as natural disasters, .. human activity is one of the factors that hav...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ility to decide everything. For example, governments around the world have issued...
^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...jects with higher costs. In conclusion, to change something we need effort and p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, really, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39686684073 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99695913413 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545691906005 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7069438215 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.35 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.15 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24155476492 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673854648819 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712074974989 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156142259151 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252212910563 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.