In recent years, there has been considerable discussion about whether students should be forced to do volunteering or not. This has led to a suggestion that volunteer service should be a compulsory course in high school courses. In my opinion, even though it is not fair for some students, this constructive idea is completely feasible.
It is true that wasting time and energy is considered one of the disadvantages of including volunteering in the high school curriculum. For example, students are usually under pressure at the end of each semester, during which time they must work hard on their studies. On top of that students need to spend part of their time to fulfill their volunteer duties. As a result, they are overwhelmed by too much work. Not only may they perform poorly on exams and submit final papers later, but they also invest less in volunteer work. Nevertheless this doesn’t mean that we should shy away from volunteering.
In fact, unpaid community service gives students the opportunity to practice and build social skills for future life and career. For example, students who volunteer to help the elderly will practice communication skills before working and develop compassion for those in need. In other words, students can understand how to treat people in society well, and this useful skill will help them do better in their future jobs.
In addition, voluntary service provides students with many mental health benefits. Many scientific studies have shown that helping others has a profound impact on our mental health. Students can not only relieve the stress related to learning, but also feel satisfied and enhance self-confidence.Therefore, as their sense of accomplishment continues to grow in their minds, students will have a positive view of their lives and future goals.
In a nutshell, the idea of making community voluntary activities a mandatory part of the high school curriculum is completely feasible. Despite a waste of time, volunteering can help students develop a sense of community and eliminate the effects of anxiety. Therefore, high school students should seize the opportunity to contribute to society
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 84
- Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every way Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop 95
- Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every way. Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop 78
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 532, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...hey also invest less in volunteer work. Nevertheless this doesn’t mean that we should shy aw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...l satisfied and enhance self-confidence.Therefore, as their sense of accomplishment conti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uture goals. In a nutshell, the idea of making community voluntary activities a ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in fact, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, it is true, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2507204611 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00672368974 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564841498559 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6542589019 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.222222222 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2777777778 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192047487107 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065283869157 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521142884762 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114810241957 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640949278278 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.