Profession athletes who receive high salaries, such as football and basketball player, deserve what they get
Many people think that it is unbelievable an athlete can get millions of dollars a year from sports club because they only show up on the stadium for an hour or much less time. However, this commonly accepted idea only note the surface phenomenon and ignore the reason behind. In my mind, those profession athletes achieving great success deserve a high salary as a reward.
Aside from genetics, it takes arduous work for sportspeople to make it to the top of their professions, regardless of their gender of age. To improve performance, dedicated athletes have undergone constant training, mostly from their childhood onward, and only enjoy a minimal amount of leisure time. Besides, they frequently have to put their body at risk and, even more frequently, cope with recurring psychological strain as a consequence of unusually stiff competition. Still, these incredible people simply don’t waver from their goals. In short, I would argue that all their commitment and sacrifices deserve abundant rewards, of which substantial sums of money may be just a token.
Besides, it is a massive expenditure for athletes to keep their body in top condition, such as strength, agility and endurance. LeBron James, the famous American professional basketball player for Los Angeles Lakers, eats eight times a day to support huge consumption in training, each dinner is carefully scheduled by his nutritionist. He spends about ten thousand dollars for food, let alone other costs on training, such as a doctor, psychologist and coach. The high salary can not be recognized as athletes’ net income, because they need much money to invest their body to compete with others and achieve good results. If we deduce the training cost from their salary, we will find they are paid much lower than what is published.
Finally, professional athletes promote the sports industry using their fame. For example, the famous football player David Beckham, his fame attracts fans to spend big money to buy tickets for his football games and products endorsed by him. The money from football fans makes it possible for sponsors to host sports events, such as the World Cup, which would make more people enjoy the charm of football by television or the Internet. Those people are potential contributors to the football industry, and they may become a football player or buy tickets for a competition someday. Profession athletes, audience and sports industry make up a positive circulation. Therefore, a high salary is arguably an insightful strategy for both professional athletes and sports industry.
In conclusion, the high salary for athletes is a reward for their hard work. Professional athletes’ income is not as much as we think, because they need to spend much money on training. Besides, the money spent on players would promote the development of sports industry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-12 | stereoData | 90 | view |
- When your professor wants you to learn in a short time which is better working in a group or alone 73
- People should buy things made in their own country even if the price is higher than the same things made elsewhere 90
- Profession athletes who receive high salaries such as football and basketball player deserve what they get 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ally, professional athletes promote the sports industry using their fame. For example,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2407.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19870410367 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77063153563 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555075593952 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8400728533 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.409090909 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0454545455 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249477168564 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715095747708 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559442004477 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142687877452 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534768726811 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.