The diagram illustrated how many cases of diarrhea in Mashhad fluctuated in the period from 1989 to 1992. Overall, cases of diarrhea experienced an upward trend.
It is clear that the number of cases stood at around 100 in 1983 and rose slightly in the next year. This was followed by another increase, although much speeder in 1985 and 1986 when the number of cases reached at 175 and well 200 respectively. However, this upward trend was suddenly broken and cases figures plummeted to the same level as they were in 1983. By contrast, the number of cases showed a dramatic rise to rocket by 400 in 1989, but this was not to last as dropped again in 1990, they were 100 cases lower than the previous year. Then the next year was the same level in case of diarrhea figures, after the number of cases plummet to the lowest point at 0 in 1992.
To sum up, the number of cases were at their highest in 1989 while the weakest figures of cases could be oserved in 1992.
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020 according to United Nations statistics Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1989 while the weakest figures of cases could be oserved in 1992.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, then, well, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40223463687 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19212353076 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558659217877 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4673758792 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175021631226 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921502161947 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031532957023 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130682025471 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187545492007 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.