Three years ago, because of flooding at the Western Palean Wildlife Preserve, 100 lions
and 100 western gazelles were moved to the East Palean Preserve, an area that is home to
most of the same species that are found in the western preserve, though in larger numbers,
and to the eastern gazelle, a close relative of the western gazelle. The only difference in
climate is that the eastern preserve typically has slightly less rainfall. Unfortunately, after
three years in the eastern preserve, the imported western gazelle population has been virtually
eliminated. Since the slight reduction in rainfall cannot be the cause of the virtual elimination
of western gazelle, their disappearance must have been caused by the larger number of
predators in the eastern preserve.
The author confidently claims that the extinction of the western gazelles is not caused by the slightly less rainfall than the Western Palean Wildlife Preserve. Although many readers might confirm this conclusion at first glimpse, it is absolute and untenable, which excluding too many possibilities after scrutiny. For example, if the slightly less rainfall destroys the food of the western gazelles, which eager more water to ensure growth. Otherwise, even if the less rainfall does not impact the food chain, the author ignored the circumstance of these lions which were moved to the East Palean Preserve together. What about these lions? Are they also endangered? If the lions’ population has decreased distinctively even eliminated too. The examination of the Gazelles can not be attributed to the larger number of predators. Consequently, the author assumes a baseless assumption, which needs more details or information to justify its accuracy and reliability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-04 | aman_kumarrr | 63 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | tedyang777 | 55 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | vishals | 55 | view |
| 2022-07-05 | iGeni | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-13 | victoraman2021 | 68 | view |
- arguement 58
- According to a recent report cheating among college and university students is on the rise However Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeav
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archaeol 58
- 123
- Three years ago because of flooding at the Western Palean Wildlife Preserve 100 lions and 100 western gazelles were moved to the East Palean Preserve an area that is home to most of the same species that are found in the western preserve though in larger
Comments
e-rater score report
flaws:
No. of Words: 149 350
Minimum 250 words wanted
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 15
No. of Words: 149 350
No. of Characters: 801 1500
No. of Different Words: 99 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.494 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.376 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.777 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 61 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 49 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.556 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.447 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.38 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.38 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.048 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 669, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... these lions? Are they also endangered? If the lions’ population has decreased dis...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.6327345309 25% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.9520958084 15% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 28.8173652695 24% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 55.5748502994 25% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 2260.96107784 36% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 149.0 441.139720559 34% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51006711409 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 4.56307096286 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90479226732 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 204.123752495 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.671140939597 0.468620217663 143% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 705.55239521 36% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.6175298403 57.8364921388 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2222222222 119.503703932 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5555555556 23.324526521 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.70786347227 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 5.15768463074 19% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197568136848 0.218282227539 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665443110749 0.0743258471296 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738618364816 0.0701772020484 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197568136848 0.128457276422 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.3799401198 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.5979740519 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.32208582834 116% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 98.500998004 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.