Being stuck among technology gears and adapting the speed of life based on them are becoming an endless process among human beings. Of course, technological advancement owe its high speed wheel movements on science but the paramount role of history should be considered beside them. Therefore, subjects like technology and science are not mutually exclusive with history and I will explain why.
On the one hand, advocates of educating future generation in fields of science and technology may have worries about their upcoming job opportunities. For example, organizations and companies are trying to appoint people who have special qualified skills in computer science, meaning most of the businesses are based on working with computers. As computers are becoming more paramount in workplaces such as works of a client, an accountant, programmers and executives, familiarity with it being compulsory. Furthermore, proponents believe that subjects like science and technology if are educated from the beginning of school time, can develop pupils mind and make them more creative because they are more complicated subjects and can challenge their mind. Therefore, They say that spending time on peripheral subjects like history can waste their time and spoil their future job opportunities because it does not play an important role in nurturing their necessary skills in occupying jobs.
On the other hand, opponents think that history is an inseparable part of any society because it enriches people’s life. It means, knowing about how ancestors saved territories and did self-sacrifices to rescue them make a sense of pride and increase society member’s patriotic sense which is necessary in terms of the lessons learned. Then, it soars the awareness of people about the importance of preserving the territory in probable future invasions. Besides, some children find history intriguing and want to choose it as their field of study. Therefore, limiting students only for special subjects can not be reasonable for whom are fond of history, meaning we should let them choose their field of studies based on their interests rather than forcing them.
To conclude, I tend to side with the opponents of considering history beside other school curriculums because it is a part of our identification and play an important role in our life.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 41
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in workplaces such as works of a client, an accountant, programmers and executive...
^^
Line 6, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...separable part of any society because it enriches people’s life. It means, knowin...
^^
Line 6, column 630, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecial subjects can not be reasonable for whom are fond of history, meaning we sho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, for example, of course, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39945652174 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88661022797 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546195652174 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.6316649951 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.928571429 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254232729453 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875488482702 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564588281955 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147866635673 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270975637284 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.