Society would benefit from a complete ban on all forms of advertisement To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Society would benefit from a complete ban on all forms of advertisement. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Concerns about the prevalence of advertisements and their effects have reached a fever pitch nowadays. While there exists an initiative that the government should impose a strict prohibition on all channels of adverts, I strongly refute such an act since advertising does offer indispensable benefits to modern society.

It appears completely unreasonable to ban all genres of advertisements. Advocates of banning adverts may argue that advertisers employ manipulative techniques to provoke customers’ desires to purchase products that they do not actually need, making people waste their money ceaselessly. Besides, even more serious consequences would hit the consumers in cases when they buy poor-quality and fake products whose functions are overstated in adverts. However, such reasoning is an invalid exaggeration since purchasers nowadays have become more alert to advertising than ever before due to their constant exposure on a daily basis. As a result, consumers tend to ponder and research more heedfully before coming to a buying decision. In short, the proposal of placing a ban on all types of advertising based on assumed yet faulty negatives of adverts is irrational.

On the contrary, I am strongly convinced that advertisements are extremely beneficial to society in several ways. The most obvious advantage is that many customers could gain insights of new products or services thanks to daily exposure to a wide range of advertisements. For example, visual adverts can provide parents with updated information about different milk products, helping them to have better purchase choices for their children. Another noticeable benefit is that advertising could maximize consumer’s gains by creating fiercer competition between companies. Specifically, the availability of advertising, followed by consumers’ better opportunities to compare products, would compel companies to constantly refine their products and offer goods with higher quality yet more reasonable prices, which in turn could financially benefit buyers.

In conclusion, I am of the belief that the advertisement brings people enormous advantages and thus the suggestion of imposing a total prohibition on all forms of advertising should be neglected.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-07 Huyenlbg87 89 view
2024-08-25 Tuan Harry 73 view
2024-06-23 kevann 73 view
2024-01-15 tteruchan65 61 view
2023-12-25 Ahmad_off 67 view
Essays by user victory89 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in short, as a result, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78614457831 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19979195098 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644578313253 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7637318536 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.214285714 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188449924054 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064835148273 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512636547085 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110889791094 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027289179277 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.