The bar chart depicts the proportion of people immigrating to Australia from five different nations between 1962 and 2002.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately apparent that the percentage of immigrants to Australia from New Zealand and Italy tended to decrease over the period shown. By contrast, the figures for the UK, India, and Vietnam tended to increase.
In 1962, the proportion of Italian people immigrating to Australia was highest, at 40%. The figures for the UK and Vietnam were much lower, at only 10%. About 8% of people from New Zealand. The figure for India was lowest, at approximately 3%.
In 1982, the proportion of Italian people immigrating to Australia decreased twofold. Similarly, the figure for New Zealand reduced by 3%. By contrast, the percentage of immigrants from the UK increased to 17%, while the figures for India and Vietnam increased fivefold and rose threefold, respectively.
By 2002, the proportion of people from Italy moving to Australia had decreased to 15%. Similarly, the figures for the UK and Vietnam had reduced to under 15%. By contrast, there were no significant changes in the figures for New Zealand and India.
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 76
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 70
- The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting the total energy from 1971 to 2011 67
- The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 74
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17616580311 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81218780054 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450777202073 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5136108675 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8461538462 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8461538462 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22583531919 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910943734237 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930742408637 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154080259625 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555173002513 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.