Summarize the points about Artificial reefs in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading passage.
One of the attraction subject through the sea is the construction of artificial reefs that are under debate. The lecture talks about the advantages of building and releasing these artificial reefs to the sea but in the lecture, the professor points out some drawbacks of these kinds of reefs.
Firstly, The first statement of the article states about artificial reefs can develop and increase the competitiveness ability of small-fisher compared to a large competitor. Small fisher can make these reefs in an unknown or secret place to advocate their professional career and their community for burgeoning their economy. Conversely, in the lecture professor completely disagree with reading because of the following reasons. Speaker stated that this idea not comprehensive in due to can caused to insecurity and increase the illegal construction of reefs in an unknown place. It is better that small-fisher informed the public to these reefs in order to maintain and security of their reefs.
Secondly, Artificial reefs can cause an increase in the attraction of fish and other marine creatures on it. Different marine will take place on this type of reefs and will cause an increase of the marine population on their community in location. In the lecture repudiate this advantage of artificial reefs by compelling explanation. Artificial reefs do not increase on fish population while actually, they disturb of the inhabitant by the instability of equilibrium of the community.
Finally, In the article stated that artificial reefs can increase the use of recycling material that would not use for other applications or purposes. Artificial reefs can construct by some outdated car and other objects that are hard to recycle or getaway. These materials can be used as a cheap, environment-friendly application. The speaker says that this not a good way or not pragmatic to reuse this material as reefs in the sea. To put in another way, this may be caused by the destruction of the environment or marine habitats by the release of chemical toxins and the dislocate of some creature in the storm condition.
In conclusion, for all of the reason the speaker mentioned in the lecture, he thinks artificial reefs not suitable to build because of three reasons that discussed.
- Summarize the points about Artificial reefs in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading passage 73
- If you want to choose a purpose which one do you choose Helping other people Enhancing time management Improving physical well being and eating healthy food 70
- frog population 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printedmaterial such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the Internet. Use specificreasons and examples to support your answer? 76
- Do you agree or disagree People who always criticize others cannot be a member of a group 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 573, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s by the release of chemical toxins and the dislocate of some creature in the storm condition...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e storm condition. In conclusion, for all of the reason the speaker mentioned in the lec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 30.3222958057 211% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 368.0 270.72406181 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1875 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01756118547 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464673913043 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 607.5 419.366225166 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0330594415 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.294117647 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6470588235 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183950272057 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068890104027 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384770685648 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111175512358 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284326394956 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.