The line graph compares figures for daily commuters using a car, bus and train during the period 1970 to 2030.
Overall, it is clear that car is the most popular of the three means of transport in the period shown. While the number of car and train commuters increases over the period, the number of bus users gradually decreases.
In 1970, there were about 5 million people travelling by car daily, compared to about 4 million and 2 million of train and bus commuters respectively. In the year 2020, the number of car drivers rose to just under 7 million and that of train passengers also increased to reach 3 million. However, there was a small drop of around half a million in the number of bus users.
In the year 2030, the number of people who commutes by car is expected to go up by another 2 million and reach almost 9 millions. Since 2000, the train usage remained constant for the following 10 years before continuing to increase steadily. It is estimated that at the end of the period approximately 5 millions people will commute by train. By contrast, the bus is predicted to be a less and less popular choice, with only 3 millions daily users.
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 78
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 61
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57416267943 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51330563275 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535885167464 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.292348127 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.6 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285892057788 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126182897676 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864796378667 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205270483335 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555515155546 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.