Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed materials such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is critically important that scholars use the best available resources when they do research. In my opinion, it is far better to use printed materials than online sources. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, printed materials such as books and articles are more reliable than websites. This is because the content on websites can be edited by anyone in the world. On the internet, nobody knows you are a dog! Even prestigious websites like Wikipedia often contain incorrect information. A real story, which happened just a few days ago demonstrates the unreliable of online sources. A post on Wikipedia BBS points out that an American teenager who doesn't speak Scots at all wrote almost all the Scottish content on Wikipedia. The teenager just uses Google to translate English content to Scots content and post them. That shows that online sources are not really reliable.
Secondly, there are so many ads on the Internet that we could be easily distracted. My own experience demonstrates this point of view. Nowadays ads videos are really interesting and the study is relatively boring. When I browsers information, it is really easy to be attracted by ads. In my freshmen year, I often lost interest in my studies easily when I did my programming course assignment, which a lot of research on the Internet is needed because of the ads on websites. But now, I try to avoid using 3C products to improve my efficiency. If I had used printed materials such as books and articles to study, it would be easier to focus on my work because those materials often don't contain unnecessary information.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that printed information is more useful than online resources. This is because books and printed journals are less likely to contain errors, and because books provide a superior level of detail.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points mentioned in the reading passage 75
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage Ethanol fuel made from plants such as corn and sugar cane has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the 65
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements In response advertising companies have started using a new tactic called buzz 3
- Question Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage Populations of the yellow cedar a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America have been stea 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...oints out that an American teenager who doesnt speak Scots at all wrote almost all the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 683, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...n my work because those materials often dont contain unnecessary information. In...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, second, secondly, so, i feel, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93730407524 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75361829142 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567398119122 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9615357453 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8947368421 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253315870221 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739995963174 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848777438261 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164379194118 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606669971463 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.