Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why?
Poverty is a global problem affecting even the most developed nations. People struck by severe poverty are homeless and beggars, who unfortunately do not have the means for a proper living. While it is a moral duty of an individual to help them in anyway possible, giving money is not the smartest option and sometimes this can lead to even worsening of their dire situation.
There have been many cases recorded by governments and NGO's that majority of the poverty stricken beggars, tend to use the money on gambling, drinking, smoking and other activities that affects their health both physical and mental. Obviously, many people cannot know what would be traded in for their penny given to the innocent beggar on the street, so it would be wise to understand the situation of the poor and what are his or her needs, which could be food, clothing or other basic amenities. In knowing so, we can directly provide them these items, which would even same them the hassle of going to the shop in order to purchase them.
Moreover, innocent and poor children whose parents are poor are sent to beg instead of them, which prevents them the opportunity to study and shape their future. Meanwhile, their parents are seen indulging in attrocious activities and living off on their child's earnings. Their parents are mostly motivated by the fact that a poor child's face attracts more attention than an old greasy adult's would. Furthermore, people would also give more money than they would to any adult beggar.
To care for beggars and poverty stricken people is a moral obligation of any citizen who can afford to do so. Despite the increase in fradulent beggars, we must not stop donating or helping the beggars who are genuine, and to distinguish between these two, you would need to stop giving them money and try to give them what they need directly. Furthermore, children should not be allowed to beg and giving out money to them would only make them continue their profession as a beggar on the streets, whose meager earnings go to their sinister parents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-27 | nusybah | 60 | view |
| 2021-06-25 | Ankita@050 | 70 | view |
| 2021-06-25 | Ankita@050 | 70 | view |
| 2021-06-25 | Ankita@050 | 70 | view |
| 2020-12-31 | yokohama | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- USA fish imports 84
- The charts below provide the primary reason tourists visited Orange City in two different years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street while others think that it is the right thing to do Which point of view do you think is correct and why 67
- hello hello 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: IN_ANYWAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in any way'?
Suggestion: in any way
...oral duty of an individual to help them in anyway possible, giving money is not the smart...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'adult'?
Suggestion: adult
...racts more attention than an old greasy adults would. Furthermore, people would also g...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, furthermore, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43721145591 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.8491199581 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.615384615 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2307692308 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165080343301 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626031128808 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482796908793 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108424041987 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360171776505 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.