The pictures show the changes of a park from 1980 to the present day.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pictures illustrate the key modifications that a park has undergone from 1980 until today.
Overall, since 1980, a lot of changes have taken place with respect to the park. The most important is the division of the two main areas of the park into four, in order for the park to facilitate more activities.
Looking at the left picture in more detail, it is evident that in 1980 a paved road split the park into two different sides. The left side was covered by grass and some flowers. Furthermore, four benches and a small lake were located at the centre of this area. The right side was, also, full of grass, flowers, and trees.
Since 1980, the shape of the park has been altered significantly. In particular, the paved road is now a crossroad splitting the park into four separate areas which are all covered by grass. The northeast area has some tables and benches and there are some people having barbeque there. In the southeast area, there are two children playing football. Finally, in the southwest area, remain three benches and the small lake, and the northwest area is empty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
- People in all modern societies use drugs but today s youth experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs and at an increasingly early age Some sociologist claim that parents and other members of society often set a bad example Discuss the causes and 78
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online 78
- More and more people are expected to be living in the urban centres in the future What problems can be caused Should government encourage people to settle outside the city 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, look, so, in particular, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72538860104 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3972229273 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580310880829 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1994221734 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0833333333 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1294287418 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513365684005 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587193721537 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102943611158 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560610799225 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.