The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph below gives information about the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. Divided by four categories such as road, water, rail, and pipeline. Overall, the chart of each type is varied. At the first glance it is evident that the most popular is road goods transported in UK with among 70 million tonnes.

As can be seen from the chart, all categories were going up and down. In 1978, goods transport by using rail and water stood at 40 million tonnes which pipeline transport still in under 20 million tonnes. The goods which transport by pipeline, water and road were going to raised up until 1990. Between all categories, rail transportation was fluctuated from 1978 until 2002. Before 1986, people in UK used rail were decreasing for shipment goods.

However, after 1998 the usability of some transportation like road, water, and railway were actively.
With the expectation of reading, they were increased dramatically but the highest was road transportation reach almost 100 million tonness. Otherwise, pipeline transportation remained constant among 20 million tonnes until over 2002

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-03 Sang Sang Sang 73 view
2024-03-03 Sang Sang Sang 73 view
2023-07-18 cookie12 78 view
2023-06-10 taocute.s1 74 view
2023-06-09 Roy An 11 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user Andi Rifani :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below gives information about the quant...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: GOING_TO_VBD[1]
Message: 'Going to' requires the base form: 'raise'
Suggestion: raise
... pipeline, water and road were going to raised up until 1990. Between all categories, ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ail were decreasing for shipment goods. However, after 1998 the usability of som...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20634920635 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77035541485 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608465608466 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7633392801 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272971622013 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108971660409 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145987277107 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168486768565 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123089092499 0.0819641961636 150% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below gives information about the quant...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: GOING_TO_VBD[1]
Message: 'Going to' requires the base form: 'raise'
Suggestion: raise
... pipeline, water and road were going to raised up until 1990. Between all categories, ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ail were decreasing for shipment goods. However, after 1998 the usability of som...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20634920635 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77035541485 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608465608466 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7633392801 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272971622013 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108971660409 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145987277107 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168486768565 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123089092499 0.0819641961636 150% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.