In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the best way to solve the problem is by providing schools and teachers. Some others think that it is better to provide computers and Internet access. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have differing views about how to aid children in rural areas regarding their access to education. Some people believe that the equipment of computers and the Internet can address the issue, while others do not. This essay will discuss both views in detail and provide evidence as to why the provision of teachers and schools is superior.
There are several compelling reasons as to why computers and the Internet should be provided.The primary justification is cost-effectiveness. The provision of computers and the Internet is much more affordable for the governments as it just involves the installation fees, the Internet connection and hiring some experts to give instructions for the students to use. Besides, the maintenance expenses are quite reasonable compared to the budget on employing teachers, repairing schools and so on. Moreover, It can be utilized for other purposes that relate to the children. Not only can they acquire knowledge from the Internet, which is informative, but they can also broaden their own horizon of other areas. It is true that they can learn Maths effectively with some software or recorded lessons by prestigious teachers. Besides, they can start learning how to play a musical instrument via tutorials on Youtube.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned merits, the ultimate and long-term solution for the problem still lies in the construction of schools and the provision of well-qualified teachers. It is true that the facilities in rural areas are not adequated compared to those in the city centers. By building more educational institutions and appointing new teachers for these regions, the matter can be alleviated because it is the shortcut to raising their education level as when it comes to learning, nothing is comparable to teachers’ role. In a classroom setting, students can grasp the lesson far more efficiently as they can ask about any problems they do not understand completely and receive instant replies from their teachers. Or, they can exchange their opinions with friends and come up with the best answer to tricky questions, which means they can blend with their peers and learn from others’ strengths while improving their own weaknesses. It means that both teachers and students actively participate in the lessons.
In summary, albeit the equipment of computers and the Internet can temporarily tackle the issue, I firmly believe the primary and fundamental solution is the provision of teachers and schools.
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the use of other is rapidly declining It is a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In developing countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the best way to solve the problem is by providing schools and teachers Some others think that it is better to provide computers and Internet acces 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ers and the Internet should be provided.The primary justification is cost-effective...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, well, while, as to, in summary, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2101.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34605597964 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9900611674 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531806615776 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7590330743 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.588235294 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1176470588 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1965116808 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662290462434 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051744370475 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142827838547 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835753749053 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.