The article states that the decline of the sea otter is caused by environmental pollution and not by predators and the reading provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains the decline is caused by predation and provides three reasons of support which refutes each of the reading reason.
The article states that the decline of the sea otter is caused by environmental pollution and not by predators and the reading provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains the decline is caused by predation and provides three reasons of support which refutes each of the reading reason.
Firstly, the reading posits that the increase level of the chemical in the sea have rendered the otter powerful and indirectly could cause their death. The professor retutes this by saying no one can find the dead sea otter and the fact that this can not be found suggest that these otter are eaten by predators.
Secondly,the reading claims that predators such as sea mammals and sea lions are declining in line with the sea otter and this implies that it can not be predator that is causing the dcline. In contrast, the professor states that the decline is caused by hunters. She explains further that hunters hunnts whales and these whale might have migrated to different location and since there are no whale for the hunters to hunt again, these hunters fall back to hunting other sea animals such as sea lions, sea otter and this means that the decline is caused by predator.
Thirdly, the reading states that the decline varies in the sea, in some it declines greatly while it is stable in other and the reading explains that only ocean current and environmental factors may cause this. The professor opposes this by predator causes the decline to vary and not the ocean current and environmental factors. She explain further that these animals are forced to shallow water area.
- No one can deny that there are negative and positive aspect of comparing the comfortability of life in the olden days to the nowadays life If i were to choose i would definitely agree that it is more comfortable to live now than the time of our grandparen 73
- The article states that the online encylopedia is not perfect compare to traditional encyclopedia and the reading provides three reasons of support However the Professor in the lecture claims that the onlone encylopedia is more perfect than the traditiona 66
- No can deny there are both positive and negative aspect of this prompt if i were to choose i would definitely disagree the at the universities 60
- Summarize the points made in the lecture 86
- No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects to children playing computer games Some will argue that because playing computer games enhances the intellectual capacity of the children and due to this it be allowed However If i were to 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... otter are eaten by predators. Secondly,the reading claims that predators such as s...
^^^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
... current and environmental factors. She explain further that these animals are forced t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33744899839 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452205882353 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.0793258392 49.2860985944 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.6 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.57556071002 0.272083759551 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.287651467978 0.0996497079465 289% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.247660020951 0.0662205650399 374% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.39299362423 0.162205337803 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.283618564816 0.0443174109184 640% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.